The House Housing Committee voted March 25 to pass SB2599 SD2 HD1 with amendments clarifying the Hawaii Community Development Authority’s (HCDA) role in a proposed development district and adding language to reassure stakeholders the bill will not affect agreements executed before enactment.
DBEDT and HCDA representatives told the committee they support codifying a formal relationship between the agencies to streamline infrastructure spending and bonding within the district. Craig Nakamoto, HCDA’s executive director, said HCDA would help with master planning and financing and was available to answer questions.
The clerk noted written opposition from Stanford Carr Development, and committee members pressed agency witnesses about whether the bill would impair existing stadium-related contracts. HCDA and DBEDT representatives said stadium contracts already executed (including agreements for dismantlement and construction) remain in force and the agencies do not intend to disrupt those arrangements.
Agribusiness Development Corporation witnesses described ADC’s planned role as master planner and zoning authority for the district, noting the authority’s plans could supersede county entitlement and zoning rules in the district (a point several committee members cited as a concern). Representative Cochran warned that the measure could appear to displace local zoning authority; committee discussion focused on balancing state infrastructure goals with county home-rule concerns.
The Chair proposed clarifying amendments on parking (including electric-vehicle-ready stalls) and a noninterference statement about preexisting contracts; the committee adopted the amendments and approved the recommendation to pass with amendments.
The committee recorded no votes from Representative Cochran and Representative Perry; the chair announced the recommendation was adopted and the bill will advance with the clarifying language.