A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Assembly panel backs ban on commercial text ads between 9 p.m. and 9 a.m. Pacific

March 25, 2026 | California State Assembly, House, Legislative, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Assembly panel backs ban on commercial text ads between 9 p.m. and 9 a.m. Pacific
The Privacy and Consumer Protection subcommittee voted to advance AB 18‑65, a bill that would prohibit commercial advertising text messages between 9 p.m. and 9 a.m. Pacific Time. Assemblymember Bauer‑Kehan, the author, said the measure follows Texas' example and aims to give Californians restful hours free from unwanted marketing texts.

"Unwanted marketing text messages have become increasingly intrusive," the author said, noting Federal Communications Commission complaint data and individual anecdotes about trigger leads and relentless post‑application contacts. Supporters described real consumer harms when phone numbers are recycled or used in marketing lists after mortgage applications or other sensitive transactions.

Opponents — including the California Chamber of Commerce, the Self Storage Association and industry trade groups — asked for clarifications about time zones for numbers with out‑of‑state numbers, exceptions for urgent transactional messages (for example, cancellations or safety alerts), and safe harbors for inadvertent scheduling or carrier delivery glitches. Committee members raised practical concerns for shift workers who may prefer receiving texts outside conventional hours, and suggested the author consider narrow exemptions or a morning hour adjustment for certain opt‑in transactional messages.

The bill was placed on the committee record and advanced; the author said she would work with stakeholders to address concerns such as early‑morning exceptions, political solicitation definitions, and safe harbors for inadvertent late deliveries.

Next steps: AB 18‑65 moves forward for further review; sponsors intend to confer with industry and legal counsel to refine exceptions and safe‑harbor language.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee