A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Commission endorses Kimbells Junction design-standards amendment with canal trail requirement

March 12, 2026 | Draper City Planning Commission Meetings, Draper , Utah County, Utah


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission endorses Kimbells Junction design-standards amendment with canal trail requirement
The Draper City Planning Commission on March 12 forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council for an amendment to the Kimbells Junction development agreement (to be called Kimbell Station) that adopts design standards and a concept plan for roughly 21 acres adjacent to the Kimballs Lane station.

Staff explained the amendment preserves the previously adopted density range (25–27 units per acre), includes a mix of three- and four-story condominium buildings and three-story townhomes, and integrates a public trail along the East Jordan Canal and efforts to preserve existing trees. The amendment modifies certain standards for this transit-oriented development (TOD): proposed building heights up to 54 feet (subject to DA limits), reduced required open space from 30% to 25%, narrower driveway and parking dimensions in places, and a 10-foot setback from public roadways while using a pedestrian network that connects buildings and amenities.

Edge Homes general counsel Paxton Guyman confirmed the applicant’s commitment to the canal trail and said Edge would add a sentence in the body of the development agreement clarifying that the trail will be installed and dedicated to the city when completed. Paxton also discussed a staff request that the applicant provide a half cul-de-sac at the end of 119 South to resolve an existing turnaround deficiency; the applicant asked the commission to permit the council-level review of off-site exaction or impact-fee credit if the city insists on that construction.

Commissioners pressed for clear language ensuring the canal trail is an explicit DA obligation; staff and the applicant agreed to add that item to the body of the agreement. Commissioners also asked staff to include three specific DA clarifications (right-of-way dedication and public improvements language, and a permit for limited staff-authorized technical adjustments) when this item moves to council.

The commission’s positive recommendation included those staff-recommended clarifications and an explicit sentence requiring installation and dedication of the canal trail to the city; the motion passed unanimously. The DA also continues provisions from the earlier rezoning, including a workforce-housing component in which the city and developer had previously agreed on buy-down assistance for a set number of units.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee