A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Hearing: Initiative 263 would eliminate legislative primaries and shift nominations to assemblies; staff ask for clearer party‑rule cross‑references

March 16, 2026 | 2026 Legislature CO, Colorado


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Hearing: Initiative 263 would eliminate legislative primaries and shift nominations to assemblies; staff ask for clearer party‑rule cross‑references
Proponents of proposed initiative No. 263 told Legislative Council staff the single subject is to elect the Colorado General Assembly by open‑list proportional representation while removing primaries for legislative offices and requiring party nominations by assembly or convention.

Pierce Lively of the Office of Legislative Legal Services summarized the proposal’s key elements, and Martha Tierney (counsel for the proponents) confirmed the broad purposes. “Yes, generally,” Tierney said, while noting that proponents expect to adjust some statutory cross‑references during drafting.

Key staff concerns raised: OLLS asked how parties would reduce candidate fields when primary elections are eliminated, specifically what mechanism will narrow a field when more than five candidates meet internal designation criteria. Proponents said party rules would govern the process and that statutory text should clarify the role of party rules and provide cross‑references to existing law where appropriate.

Ballot-order and timing questions: Staff questioned which official performs lot drawings that determine slate order, whether the 75‑day prior publication requirement would conflict with current unaffiliated‑candidate deadlines, and whether late deadlines could compress county clerks’ and the secretary of state’s timelines. Proponents said they would reconcile deadlines and consider minor timing adjustments so election officials are not disadvantaged.

What’s next: Proponents agreed to amend statutory references and add clarifications on party‑rule authority, lot procedures for ballot order, and petition timelines. No legislative action or vote occurred at the hearing.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee