A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

State Board of Health adopts policy to retain health impact review materials beyond six years

March 12, 2026 | Board Council Commission Agencies , Executive, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

State Board of Health adopts policy to retain health impact review materials beyond six years
The Washington State Board of Health voted to adopt a new records-retention policy for its health impact reviews, directing staff to preserve HIR source materials beyond the six-year schedule used for most state records.

Lindsay Herondine, a HIR policy analyst for board staff, told members the draft policy would "convert HIRs and underlying source material to reference material to retain internally in perpetuity and will retain HIR request forms, executive summaries, and final reports for 10 years on the board's website." The board debated whether "in perpetuity" was practicable given storage costs and evolving data systems.

After questions from board members about archive costs and precedent, Member Nandi moved adoption of the updated policy, and Member Kurtz seconded. The board approved the motion by voice vote. Board materials and staff commentary say the change reflects HIRs' role as a unique, non-routine evidence base used to inform later policy and legislative requests.

Why it matters: HIRs collect endnotes, evidence reviews, interview notes and calculations that staff say are frequently reused when policymakers seek historical context or repeat analyses. Supporters argued that losing those packages after six years would force staff to reassemble work already done; critics and several members urged clear limits and a plan for storage costs.

What comes next: Staff will finalize policy wording and guidance to implement the retention schedule and report back if storage or budgetary constraints require revisiting the "in perpetuity" language. The board's action formalizes a longer retention practice while directing staff to reconcile it with state archives processes.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee