A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Clemency board recommends pardon for Dominic LaPreme, citing collateral harms to family and business

March 12, 2026 | Board Council Commission Agencies , Executive, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Clemency board recommends pardon for Dominic LaPreme, citing collateral harms to family and business
The Washington State Clemency and Pardons Board voted 4–1 to recommend a pardon for petitioner Dominic LaPreme, who told the board that longstanding convictions continue to prevent him from contracting with military and government entities and from traveling to Canada to visit family.

LaPreme, represented by attorney Kurt Bennett, said he was 18 at the time of the offenses and described rehabilitation in custody and post-release: "I've built a family, deep lasting relationships, and several businesses such as HomeStreet Electric," he told the board. Bennett argued a pardon was necessary because some convictions in this case are not vacatable under state law. The prosecutor, Thurston County senior deputy Joseph Jackson, said the office would not take a formal position but noted the legislature has deemed certain offenses not vacatable under RCW 9.94A.640 and that the court had vacated other charges in a separate proceeding.

Board members asked about specific collateral consequences: inability to bid on contracts with Joint Base Lewis-McChord and naval bases, limits on mentoring and coaching youth programs, and barriers to entering Canada. Jacqueline LaPreme, the petitioner’s wife, described family impacts from being unable to travel with her husband to visit relatives in Whistler and Alberta.

Board Member Rhonda Salveson moved to recommend a pardon, Vice Chair Doug Baldwin seconded, and the motion carried 4–1. Chair Raymond Delas Reyes reminded the petitioner that the board’s recommendation is advisory and that the governor holds the final decision.

The board recorded testimony, the prosecution's briefing, and the vote in the public record; details about the specific contracts and the Canadian process were presented by counsel and witnesses during testimony.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee