A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Applicant granted after‑the‑fact setback variance for existing garage; board cites hardship

March 12, 2026 | Worcester County, Maryland


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Applicant granted after‑the‑fact setback variance for existing garage; board cites hardship
The Worcester County Board of Zoning Appeals on March 12 approved an after‑the‑fact variance to reduce the required side‑yard setback from 8 feet to 6.5 feet for an existing detached garage at 9 Burghill Drive.

The applicant, Susanna Specht, told the board she represents elderly parents who moved to Frederick and discovered during an attempt to sell the house that the garage lacked a final occupancy inspection and a recent resurvey showed the garage sits 6.5 feet from the property line instead of the required 8 feet. "The garage has been there for over 22 years," Specht said, and she argued that moving or demolishing it would be a hardship while the family is trying to sell the property.

Board members asked about permitting records and contractor information. Specht said she had inspection records for the footer but not contractor contact information and that she had been told by Ocean Pines association staff that the property was cleared for resale. Staff and the board discussed whether any other violations existed; Specht said there were not. The board considered the standard variance criteria, including special conditions resulting from prior survey/permit work and the practical difficulty of removing the garage after decades in place.

After board discussion, the chair moved to grant Case 26‑15; a board member seconded the motion and the board voted in favor. The vote was recorded as unanimous in favor of the variance.

The decision grants the property relief to keep the existing garage in its current location; no additional conditions beyond those discussed at the hearing were recorded on the record. The applicant said the family is trying to sell the house and that the owners are elderly and in poor health, which the board cited in weighing hardship. The board proceeded to the next docket item following the vote.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee