A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Growers and economists testify that California faces widespread vineyard removals and deep price pressure

March 12, 2026 | California State Senate, Senate, Legislative, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Growers and economists testify that California faces widespread vineyard removals and deep price pressure
At a Sacramento Select Committee hearing in Napa, growers and economists described a severe market collapse for table wine and grape fruit that has prompted widespread vineyard removal.

Chris Bitter, a wine economist who said he works for American AgCredit, told the committee that California wine sales have fallen about 25% since 2019 and that imports and falling exports magnify the problem. He said LA Grape Growers estimated 20% of the 2025 crop was left unpicked because buyers were not available, and that more than 50,000 acres were retired between 2023 and 2025.

Michael Miller, director of government relations for the California Association of Wine Grape Growers, offered similar figures and emphasized the human and operational costs: removing a vineyard can cost thousands of dollars per acre, markets for disposal are limited because of air quality rules and composting costs, and fallowed land can lose agricultural designation making replanting expensive and uncertain.

Growers and panelists urged several near‑term responses: review of regulatory implementation to reduce unnecessary compliance costs, examination of trade remedies and market supports, transitional assistance for defraying vineyard removal costs, and evaluation of permitting barriers to replanting fallowed land.

Panelists cautioned that solutions must respect labor and environmental protections; multiple speakers urged that any state action be paired with workforce supports so farmworkers are not left behind.

The committee asked staff to compile comparative data on regulatory cost differentials between California and other states to better target potential reforms; no votes were taken.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee