A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Meadow Ridge Estates subdivision discussed at Benton County DRC; septic, frontage and gated‑entry details remain to resolve

March 11, 2026 | Benton County, Arkansas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Meadow Ridge Estates subdivision discussed at Benton County DRC; septic, frontage and gated‑entry details remain to resolve
A project representative presented Meadow Ridge Estates to the Benton County Development Review Committee on March 11, describing a small major subdivision with 24 lots and a one‑acre minimum lot size. The representative said, “They're all 1 acre lot to minimum,” and confirmed “24 lots” and that on‑site septic testing has been completed and is “working out.”

The committee discussed utilities and addressing. 9‑1‑1 administration told the applicant the subdivision will need three road names and recommended submitting extra name options to avoid duplication; the official advised staying away from locally common elements such as “meadow” or other terms already widely used in Bentonville. The applicant confirmed water service will be provided by Centerton Water.

Health department regional specialist Caroline cautioned developers to protect designated lateral‑field areas during dirt work and staging, saying those areas “need to stay protected” so subsequent septic installations are not damaged; she reiterated that each lot will require an individual septic permit when built. The applicant said lot staking to identify pits is scheduled later in the week so the health reviewer can verify which lot each test pit corresponds to.

Reviewers and an inspector flagged several dimensional concerns. An inspector noted lot frontage and depth‑to‑frontage (the 4:1 rule) could make lots 18, 20, 12 and 23 “questionable,” and that Lot 23 may need setback adjustments; the applicant said they would examine lot‑line adjustments and possible variances to preserve as many lots as possible. Staff also asked the applicant to ensure gated‑entry geometry provides sufficient vehicle stacking; the inspector advised a minimum stacking room of four vehicles, front to back.

Staff directed the applicant to relay any lot changes promptly to the septic designer so final plats and permits line up with field conditions. No formal motions or votes were recorded; the item concluded with the applicant agreeing to revise lot lines as needed and to coordinate with county reviewers on setbacks, frontage and septic protections.

The DRC moved on to other agenda items after closing technical comments on Meadow Ridge Estates.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee