Resident raises concerns about Shasta Power outreach, survey methods for proposed solar project

Paul Frederick, a resident who lives across from a proposed solar site, told the Crawford County Board of Commissioners on Feb. 24 that he and neighbors are uneasy about Shasta Power’s outreach and data collection for the project. "I am not impressed with how Shasta Power seems to be shifting the pool numbers when it comes to their survey to attempt to meet the required number," Frederick said.

Frederick said the timing of public information about the proposal is problematic given pending bills in Topeka, the county’s ongoing comprehensive plan update and unresolved zoning issues. He asked why the company had not provided examples from other counties with solar developments to show potential benefits, calling that omission a "red flag." Frederick said his household received only informational materials and voicemail messages and that direct conversations were limited.

Commissioner Carl Wood asked whether company representatives had pressured property owners; Frederick replied they had only left information and voicemails. Chairman Commissioner Bruce Blair noted the county had received an email from Shasta Power saying the company would not return until March. County Counselor Jim Emerson confirmed the company had told the county it would be back later in March, and no formal action was taken at the meeting.

Why it matters: The remarks put public concern about developer outreach and data collection on record as the county works through its comprehensive plan and zoning decisions that could affect siting. The board did not vote on any permitting or parcel-specific items at the Feb. 24 meeting; Frederick said he and others do not want their names publicly linked to support or opposition.

What’s next: Commissioners and county staff indicated they expect Shasta Power representatives to return in March; the record of public comment will be part of subsequent hearings and any formal zoning or permitting process.