A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Senators press Appropriations on DHHS cuts, ABA rate changes and Education Future Fund transfers

March 10, 2026 | 2026 Legislature NE, Nebraska


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senators press Appropriations on DHHS cuts, ABA rate changes and Education Future Fund transfers
As debate on LB 10‑71 continued, multiple senators pressed Appropriations Committee members for details on several line items and proposed savings in AM 21‑62.

Senator McKinney and others criticized the plan to convert the McCook work‑ethic camp in part for proposed federal contracting (see separate item), while senators focused heavily on Department of Health and Human Services reductions. Committee chair Senator Clements said the committee identified roughly $100 million in savings in the second year of the biennium and described strategies including converting contract staff to state employees and rate corrections. “We had 20 agencies that have reduced in this budget and 27 that are either level or went up,” Clements said, and referred members to the Goldenrod book for line‑by‑line detail.

Senators DeBoer and others asked for specifics. Clements and analysts identified a personal‑service limit increase tied to converting contractors (roughly $25.8 million in PSL changes across the biennium) and said applied behavioral analysis (ABA) provider rate corrections account for about $11–12 million of the reductions.

Senator Mikaela Kavanaugh raised concern about the Education Future Fund cash flow: the bill shows regular transfers to the fund of $250 million but expenditures of roughly $420 million annually, producing a projected deficit by the 2028–29 biennium unless transfers or expenditures change. She warned that special education funding, foundation aid and several one‑time grants are paid from that fund and flagged long‑term sustainability questions.

Several senators expressed concern that proposed Medicaid “savings” may shift costs to hospitals or individuals if coverage is lost, and emphasized the need for clearer fiscal notes and agency detail before approving major adjustments.

What’s next: Appropriations will continue to answer line‑item questions and may return with additional amendments or bills directing DHHS adjustments; the floor record shows ongoing negotiation but no final disposition recorded in the provided excerpt.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee