A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Woods End Road owner argues wetlands and easement lower property value; requests 25% land reduction

March 11, 2026 | Fairfield, Fairfield, Connecticut


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Woods End Road owner argues wetlands and easement lower property value; requests 25% land reduction
Therese Dykman told the Fairfield appeals panel on March 5 that her Woods End Road property is encumbered by a town engineering easement containing an open ditch approximately six feet wide and three to four feet deep, wetlands and an upland review setback that stretches roughly 100 feet and covers much of her yard. Dykman said those restrictions prevent access, mowing, and development in portions of the lot and reduce its marketability.

"It consists of an open ditch approximately 6 feet wide by 3 to 4 feet deep running across the entire property," Dykman said, and she told the panel conservation and engineering restrictions prevent filling or fencing the area. She said the lot was developed in 1954, before wetland regulations, and that soil mapping and conservation review would be required to enlarge or rebuild the home — a process she estimated would cost more than $10,000 and provides no guarantee of approval.

Dykman asked the board to apply a 25% reduction to the land value rather than the 5% consideration currently recorded, and to adjust the house value to reflect deferred maintenance and original features. The clerk reviewed the field cards and comparisons Dykman supplied and acknowledged that the three comparables presented lack wetland encumbrances and appear unencumbered, which supports the appellant's request for a larger land adjustment.

The clerk said she will attach Dykman's photos, maps and field cards to her file and present the case to the full board for a vote. No board decision was recorded at the March 5 hearing; the clerk said the appellant will receive a mailed decision after the full board reviews the appeal.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee