A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Taxation committee debates overhaul of tax appeals process, tables changes pending clearer text

March 10, 2026 | 2026 Legislature ME, Maine


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Taxation committee debates overhaul of tax appeals process, tables changes pending clearer text
The committee took up LD 2178, a multipart Department bill that would reorganize tax appeals and adjust when cases go to the State Board of Property Tax Review.

John Sagaser, tax policy counsel for Maine Revenue Services, outlined the proposal’s components: adding duties to the taxpayer advocate, repealing the three‑member Board of Tax Appeals and creating an independent Office of Tax Appeals with staff transferred into DAS, clarifying the State Board of Property Tax Review’s jurisdictional rules for nonresidential abatements, and launching a study and ongoing legislative review. Sagaser described recommended amendment language on panel size, qualifications, duties and transition dates and urged changes that preserve legislative oversight where appropriate.

Stakeholders and practitioners raised objections and clarifying requests. Kerry Leishman, an assessor and State Board member, cautioned that three‑member panels can lack the varied expertise (engineer, lawyer, appraiser, assessor) typically needed for complex nonresidential cases. Amanda Campbell of the Maine Municipal Association said assessors generally prefer the status quo for local boards but agreed that very large commercial cases often require state expertise. Tax attorney Jonathan Block recommended a fuller stakeholder task force and sufficient municipal, assessor and practitioner representation before making broad structural changes.

Senator Bruce Bickford proposed an amendment to remove parts C and D and create an expedited task force with legislative appointees and stakeholder seats; members debated whether to adopt immediate structural changes or to funnel disputed items into a focused study. After a committee caucus, members voted to table LD 2178 until Thursday so staff and agency partners can provide a clean bill text, workflow charts and revised amendment language for clearer review.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee