A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Council discusses winding down local rental assistance as Measure A county programs come online

January 31, 2026 | Claremont City, Los Angeles County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council discusses winding down local rental assistance as Measure A county programs come online
City staff told the Claremont City Council that the local rental assistance program established with ARPA and supplemented by general fund dollars totals about $1.7 million and is being disbursed at roughly $50,000–$60,000 per month.

"We expect that funding to run out in June 2026, unless the council directs us to do something else with the funding," City Manager Perry said, outlining options for the council.

Staff recommended, pending council direction, that the city stop accepting new applications for the Claremont Temporary Housing Stabilization/relocation grant and refer new applicants to county and San Gabriel Valley (COG) programs now funded by Measure A. Katie Wan, in the city manager's office, told council that county programs are likely to provide shorter, emergency‑style assistance (for example up to six months) and have eligibility differences that mean not all Claremont participants would automatically qualify.

To avoid leaving anyone without support during the transition, staff proposed using the city's successor housing fund for a temporary extension of the local program. Perry estimated a bridge through December 2026 would cost about $360,000 at current spending rates. The city attorney reminded the council that vice mayor Reese previously received FPPC advice about participating in tenant‑protection discussions when carve‑outs for certain landlords are proposed and may need to recuse from such discussions.

Council feedback: Members broadly favored pursuing transitions to regional programs to avoid duplicative spending but asked staff to return with detailed counts of current participants who would or would not qualify for county/COG programs, and to propose a plan for assisting participants to apply (including technical assistance and coordination with La Casa/COG). Council asked staff to return with a report in April to evaluate progress and whether limited successor fund support is needed to cover people who do not qualify for county programs.

Next steps: staff will coordinate with COG and La Casa on outreach and technical assistance for participants and return in April with data on projected transitions and recommended bridge funding if necessary.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee