Freeborn County authorizes administrator to coordinate with Sherburne County on lobbying against bills affecting federal contracts

The Freeborn County Board on March 3 adopted a resolution authorizing the county administrator to work with Sherburne County and other partners to advocate against proposed legislation that, staff said, could limit counties' ability to enter federal contracts. The authorization lets the administrator seek cost‑sharing and, if needed, expend up to $6,000 from the administration contingency fund — language that the resolution frames as permissive (“may” spend up to that amount).

Administration staff reported TPAT research showing Freeborn County has received roughly $60 million in federal contract revenue over the past decade and said the proposed bills — several of which target contracts relating to immigration enforcement (ICE) — could have material financial consequences for affected counties. The administrator recommended authorizing coordination so Freeborn County can join other affected counties and sheriff associations to ensure a voice in discussions.

Commissioners debated the proposal. Some argued the county already pays dues to AMC and NACO, which provide lobbying services, and questioned whether an additional targeted lobbying expenditure is necessary. Others said AMC represents all 87 counties and may not prioritize issues affecting the handful of counties that hold ICE contracts; supporters said a coordinated, targeted response could be more effective for issues that specifically affect a small group of counties.

Questions were raised about fiscal constraints given recent budget pressures, clarity on which budget line would cover any expense (administration contingency fund), and the likelihood of the bills advancing out of committee. Several commissioners urged caution and suggested first seeking engagement through existing associations and contacting state legislators; others said the permissive language preserves flexibility for the administrator to act quickly if a specific need arises.

The board approved the resolution by roll call. Several commissioners said the motion does not obligate the county to spend funds but authorizes staff to act if warranted and to seek cost‑sharing with other counties.

No specific lobbying contract was awarded at the meeting.