The council adopted an always-stop control (installation of stop signs) at the Finn Street and Prospect Street intersection after residents and staff presented safety concerns and an outside engineering analysis recommended intersection control.
Several residents who use the crosswalk near Finn and Prospect told the council they felt the intersection was dangerous for children and pedestrians. "I urge you to vote for safety," said Andrea Fox, a Prospect Street homeowner who crosses the intersection daily with children and cited limited visibility and frequent higher-speed turning movements.
The Department of Public Works engaged Fuss & O'Neill to evaluate sight lines and intersection-control criteria; DPW Director said the consultant collected speed data, observed speeding in the field visit, and concluded sight-line distances did not meet required metrics even when using conservative speed assumptions. "Even at 25 miles an hour, you are still not hitting required sight line distances," the director told the council.
Some councilors urged additional traffic-calming measures and questioned whether stop signs are the optimal long-term solution, noting stop signs are not intended as first-line traffic calming. Councilor Stratton opposed the measure, citing the need for more robust traffic-calming study and the availability of alternative measures, and Councilor Robbins abstained due to concerns about process.
On roll call the ordinance motion passed with a majority of councilors voting to approve the always-stop control, one abstention and one recorded no vote. The measure directs DPW to install signage and pavement markings consistent with the engineering report and NHTSA/AASHTO sight-line guidance, and DPW said installation will be scheduled with standard materials and followed by evaluation.
What's next: DPW will install signage and markings and monitor the intersection; the council can refer follow-up traffic-calming work to Transportation and Parking or other committees for longer-term measures.