A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

City’s Floral Avenue safety measures and Stewart Park ADA upgrades highlighted in facilities review

March 06, 2026 | Ithaca City, Tompkins County, New York


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

City’s Floral Avenue safety measures and Stewart Park ADA upgrades highlighted in facilities review
The committee reviewed two public‑facilities proposals: a city-sponsored pedestrian-and-cyclist safety plan for Floral Avenue that would install raised crosswalks, rectangular rapid-flashing beacons (RRFBs) and other traffic-calming measures; and an application to make the Wharton Studio building and its approaches in Stewart Park fully ADA‑accessible.

Members questioned whether the city had budgeted the Floral Avenue work or planned it to coincide with larger repaving efforts. Staff and committee members noted the corridor crosses city, town and state jurisdictions and flagged the need to coordinate with state DOT on technical requirements. The city’s attachments (not always included in committee binders) show proposed raised crosswalks at three locations and examples of RRFB installations; staff recommended asking the city to clarify whether beacons are included in the project budget and whether the plan could be scaled to one high‑priority crossing rather than the entire corridor.

On the Wharton Studio ADA application, members supported removing architectural barriers but asked who owns the building and whether other funding or city commitments exist for long‑term maintenance (including snow clearance). Staff said ADA accessibility is an eligible use of CDBG funds in regional parks for removal of barriers, but asked the committee to confirm ownership and whether the project would be sustainable year‑round.

The panel suggested follow-ups to applicants: clarify project budgets and attachments, identify coordination steps with paving and DOT, document ownership and long-term maintenance commitments for park facilities, and supply granular cost breakdowns if the project is to be scaled.

No votes were taken; staff will gather the committee’s questions and request clarifying materials from the applicants ahead of public hearings.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee