A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Former DHS counsel Steve Bunnell urges judicial warrants for home entries, rejects 'deep state' label

March 06, 2026 | Oversight Committee Democrats, Oversight and Reform: House Committee, Standing Committees - House & Senate, Congressional Hearings Compilation, Legislative, Federal


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Former DHS counsel Steve Bunnell urges judicial warrants for home entries, rejects 'deep state' label
Steve Bunnell, who served as general counsel of the Department of Homeland Security from 2013 to 2017, told a congressional committee that the department should stop conducting forcible entries into private homes without a judicial warrant.

"The judicial warrant is a requirement of the Fourth Amendment and it applies to ICE just like it applies to every other federal, state, and local law enforcement agency," Bunnell said, urging the department to respect constitutional limits on searches and seizures.

Bunnell said he was one of six former DHS general counsels who co‑authored a New York Times op‑ed opposing a new ICE policy that relies on administrative arrest warrants to enter residences for civil immigration violations. He told the committee the former counsels come from multiple administrations and agreed that the Fourth Amendment requires a judicial warrant for forced home entry.

He also criticized recent rhetoric by DHS leadership that described career DHS lawyers as "deep state operatives," calling that characterization "a cheap shot and it's wrong." He warned such attacks carry consequences for legal advice within the agency: "If you give your best professional advice and urge the department to respect the law, you will be attacked for doing your job."

Citing Supreme Court precedent, Bunnell emphasized that physical entry into a home without a judicial warrant is "presumptively unreasonable" and that the Fourth Amendment protects "the people," a formulation he said extends constitutional protections to noncitizens present in the United States.

Bunnell disputed ICE's stated legal rationale that the agency's detention authority combined with a final removal order satisfies the Fourth Amendment. He argued immigration judges are members of the executive branch who are subject to the attorney general and the president and therefore are not the "neutral and detached" magistrates required to authorize warrantless home entries; he added that immigration judges lack statutory authority to issue arrest or search warrants.

Bunnell closed by offering to "flesh out these points and others during my testimony" and again urged DHS to "adhere to the Constitution and end the un‑American practice of conducting forcible entries into homes without judicial warrants."

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee