A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

House approves state process to designate domestic terrorist organizations; critics cite due‑process risks

March 03, 2026 | 2026 Legislature FL, Florida


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

House approves state process to designate domestic terrorist organizations; critics cite due‑process risks
The Florida House on Wednesday passed CS/CS/HB 1471, establishing a state process for designating domestic terrorist organizations and imposing related penalties for membership and material support. Representative Cassell, the sponsor, said the bill protects courts and taxpayer dollars and sets a structured, evidence‑based process that involves FDLE findings, federal coordination and a cabinet vote.

"It makes clear that Florida courts will apply American laws, most notably the United States Constitution, not foreign legal doctrines," Cassell said during floor remarks. He emphasized written findings, public notice and a 30‑day judicial review window after designation.

Opponents raised constitutional and operational objections. Representative Harris and others warned that a politically appointed cabinet could make designations that have substantial consequences for speech, association and livelihoods before judicial review. Representative Rayner and others pointed to historical abuses and argued the bill risks punishing speech and association prior to adjudication. During debate Representative Gant proposed and lost an amendment to remove explicit references to Sharia law from the text, a flashpoint in the floor debate.

The bill also contains provisions aimed at campus conduct: it authorizes universities to sanction students who promote designated organizations under institutional honor codes and provides for certain administrative penalties. Sponsors said the bill includes due‑process steps and coordination with federal intelligence agencies; critics said the process risks selective enforcement and chilling protected expression.

After extensive structured debate, the House approved the bill 81 yeas to 26 nays.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee