A proposal to make certain Utah tax credits ‘flat’ regardless of marital status or filing status failed on the House floor on March 2. The fifth substitute to HB 2 10, presented by Representative Melissa Ballard, was intended to standardize the taxpayer, retirement and child tax credits so recipients would receive the same credit year to year regardless of relationship status; the substitute failed on final passage, 31–42.
Representative Ballard told the House the substitute had three main elements including eliminating a Social Security portion that existed in previous substitutes and limiting increments to $30. He argued the change would provide predictability for taxpayers: “this is really great policy for knowing what’s in our wallet for our flat income tax… and now consistent tax credits regardless of what our relationships are,” he said.
Supporters argued a flat structure would reduce confusion and better target indicators of poverty. Representative Boxier said the change would signal support for stable families and adjust perceived inequities in filing status outcomes. Opponents urged more study and cautioned about unintended consequences: a member who has served with the Uniform Law Commission warned the change could make Utah nonconforming in important multistate frameworks and urged additional interim work before adopting changes that could affect commerce and inter‑state uniformity.
After summations, the House called the vote. The fifth substitute failed to garner a majority, 31 yes to 42 no. The Speaker instructed staff to send records to enrolling or staff for filing as appropriate.