Residents press commissioners on harm reduction, budget transparency and Elwha lands during forum

A broad cross‑section of residents used the Dec. 30 commissioner forum to press the board on several policy areas: harm reduction programs, budget transparency around criminal justice contract figures, concerns about the Charter Review Commission process and potential county interest in federal Elwha Project lands.

Multiple speakers challenged the efficacy of harm reduction. One commenter said, "We pretty much know that the harm reduction program does not work," while county officials replied that the Board of Health has requested performance data and the county has invested in clinical services models in detention facilities to connect people to treatment. "It is not accurate to say that harm reduction does not work," a county official responded, citing evidence the approach reduces overdose deaths and connects people to services.

Public commenters also sought clarity on whether the projected increases tied to criminal justice contracts were disclosed during the county's budget and levy discussions. County staff responded that the revenue estimates were included in 2026 projections and that the six‑month amendments incorporate reconciliation to match actuals at term end.

Several residents urged more open government and specific follow‑up: requests included a work session on whether Clallam County should express interest in Elwha Project lands pending federal disposal legislation, and a call for HHS to present measurable performance goals. Dr. Sarah Hueling, speaking online, urged elected officials to measure policy by community outcomes: "If we want different outcomes, we have to change the system... elected officials need tools, clear metrics, honest reporting, and the courage to measure not just services delivered, but the lived impacts on community life."

The board acknowledged the concerns, reiterated the auditor's role in expense review and committed to further work sessions and follow‑up reporting on data and reconciliations. No formal decisions on policy changes were taken during the forum; commissioners said staff will return with the requested information or schedule work sessions where appropriate.