Staff presented proposed revisions to the artificial-intelligence section of the district's technology use guidelines at the May 28 meeting, saying updates were needed because AI tools are evolving rapidly.
The presenter said the revisions keep core concepts but remove language endorsing AI detection software for plagiarism or disciplinary decisions, citing unreliability. The updated draft also tightens language on equitable access and accessibility. Staff said they worked with a consultant experienced in AI in education and partnered with Longwood University and regional school divisions on review sessions.
Board members discussed the need for frequent updates and asked clarifying questions; staff said they anticipate annual reviews despite a two-year policy review requirement. The board did not adopt a final policy during this presentation but expressed support for the revisions and for returning with a final version when ready.
The discussion focused on striking a balance between using AI as an instructional tool and ensuring it does not become a flawed disciplinary substitute. Staff emphasized reliance on qualified consultants and cross-division input when drafting final language.