A board member (S1) moved to censure President Alexander, saying the president had violated the board's governance policy and that the release of a "one-sided story" unfairly harmed Superintendent Kramer. "I move to censure Mister Alexander for violations of the board governance," S1 said, later adding the motion was about "the manner in which information was used."
Board members debated the motion, with S1 emphasizing accountability and respect and others questioning both procedure and intent. S3, who led the meeting, framed the issue as a breach of the board governance policy the trustees agreed to when sworn. "It's based on this breach of our board of trustees governance policy," S3 said during discussion.
S3 called a roll-call vote. The transcript records the spoken votes from the meeting: S5 "My vote is yay," S2 "I vote nay," S1 "My vote is yay," and S3 "I vote nay." The chair later announced a brief recess to consult on a potential conflict of interest before stating that the motion failed for lack of a majority. The chair said the board required five affirmative votes and that the motion did not reach that threshold.
The motion referenced specific governance provisions (cited in the meeting as provisions 1.5, 1.1 and 1.4) and invoked the board's internal policies; these governance rules were discussed repeatedly in the debate. No formal sanction was adopted. The board moved on after the chair announced the motion had failed.