A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee amends H588 to clarify massage/bodywork registration and establishment fees

February 28, 2026 | Ways & Means, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Committees, Legislative , Vermont


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee amends H588 to clarify massage/bodywork registration and establishment fees
The Ways & Means Committee on Tuesday approved a committee amendment to H588 that reorganizes fee provisions for massage therapists, bodyworkers and related touch professions and establishes a reduced establishment fee for very small practices.

Tim Devlin, legislative counsel, told the committee the amendment moves the existing $90 registration fee into a single fees section and creates a new reduced $50 establishment fee for qualifying small establishments. "The 90-dollar fee is just being moved on statute," Devlin said, adding the change is intended as housekeeping to reduce practitioner confusion about registration versus licensure.

Jennifer Collin, director of the Office of Professional Regulation, told the committee the office supports the draft because regulating the massage/bodywork profession carries disproportionate enforcement costs and the change addresses concerns raised by small practitioners.

Under the amendment as explained, an individual practitioner who operates alone registers as a massage therapist and pays the practitioner registration fee; an establishment run by two massage therapists qualifies for a reduced $50 establishment registration fee; establishments with three or more therapists pay the regular establishment fee. Biannual renewal fees mirror the application structure (reduced-establishment renewal $75).

Representative Masland moved adoption of the committee amendment (draft 1.2); Representative Kimball seconded. The clerk called the roll and the amendment was voted favorable by the committee. The committee then voted to find H588 favorable as amended; the measure will be referred to Appropriations for further consideration.

The committee did not debate changes to the dollar amounts beyond the drafting rearrangement; sponsors described the changes as clarifying and intended to ease compliance by very small practices.

The bill was advanced by the committee and will next be scheduled with the Appropriations Committee.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee