Greenville narrows K–5 ELA finalists to three; decision targeted by June
May 13, 2024 | GREENVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, School Districts, New York
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The Greenville Central School District’s ELA selection committee told the board on May 13 that it has narrowed a search of 14 K–5 English language arts programs to three finalists and expects to make a selection by early June.
"We started with 14 programs… we narrowed it down to 4 and then to 3," Matthew Birch, who led the selection update, said. The three finalists named were Benchmark Advance; Amplify Core Knowledge Language Arts (CKLA); and Open Up Resources/Bookworms (the committee noted the free Open Up version was scored differently in national reviews because some differentiated-instruction materials were not included in the free package).
Birch said the committee’s work included a district rubric, vendor presentations tailored to Greenville, hard-copy materials distributed to teachers, classroom visits to other districts, pilot lessons and discussions with teachers, coaches and administrators. The committee considered implementation time, how the program aligns with existing foundational phonics instruction (the district uses "really great reading" for tier 1 foundational skills), and how writing instruction is integrated into each program.
On next steps, Birch said the committee will begin consensus-building conversations at its next meeting and hopes to have a decision by early June. If the committee reaches agreement, the 2024–25 school year will be used as a learning year for professional development ahead of a k–5 rollout in September 2025.
Why it matters: choosing an ELA curriculum affects instruction, teacher training and materials purchases across elementary grades. Board members asked about writing instruction, pilot feedback, time needed for implementation and how the district will provide professional learning to ensure fidelity of instruction if a new program is selected.
The committee emphasized the importance of training teachers, coaches and administrators before full classroom rollout and said teachers will have opportunities to test-drive program units during the learning year.
Provenance: committee update and Q&A recorded during the board meeting (committee meeting timeline and finalists discussed).
"We started with 14 programs… we narrowed it down to 4 and then to 3," Matthew Birch, who led the selection update, said. The three finalists named were Benchmark Advance; Amplify Core Knowledge Language Arts (CKLA); and Open Up Resources/Bookworms (the committee noted the free Open Up version was scored differently in national reviews because some differentiated-instruction materials were not included in the free package).
Birch said the committee’s work included a district rubric, vendor presentations tailored to Greenville, hard-copy materials distributed to teachers, classroom visits to other districts, pilot lessons and discussions with teachers, coaches and administrators. The committee considered implementation time, how the program aligns with existing foundational phonics instruction (the district uses "really great reading" for tier 1 foundational skills), and how writing instruction is integrated into each program.
On next steps, Birch said the committee will begin consensus-building conversations at its next meeting and hopes to have a decision by early June. If the committee reaches agreement, the 2024–25 school year will be used as a learning year for professional development ahead of a k–5 rollout in September 2025.
Why it matters: choosing an ELA curriculum affects instruction, teacher training and materials purchases across elementary grades. Board members asked about writing instruction, pilot feedback, time needed for implementation and how the district will provide professional learning to ensure fidelity of instruction if a new program is selected.
The committee emphasized the importance of training teachers, coaches and administrators before full classroom rollout and said teachers will have opportunities to test-drive program units during the learning year.
Provenance: committee update and Q&A recorded during the board meeting (committee meeting timeline and finalists discussed).
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
