A sponsor told the committee the bill clarifies state law so that redevelopment plans, reauthorizations and borrowing must fit within an existing 10% cap on tax allocation under the Redevelopment Powers Act. The sponsor said his intent was to make clear the statutory limit and avoid ambiguity in reauthorizations.
Why it matters: A statutory clarification on the tax-base percentage could affect the scope of redevelopment financing and local bonding for projects using tax allocation financing.
What was said: The sponsor said he was involved in the original legislation and that 10% has historically been the number used. He asked to continue conversations on implementation and did not want to impede legitimate redevelopment activity.
Outcome: After limited discussion the committee approved the motion to advance the bill by voice vote.