Committee members voted to insert water-quality language into SWA’s powers, objectives and duties and to recommend membership language that prefers a member with conservancy interests if committees are combined.
Speaker 6 moved to add explicit water-quality language to SWA’s objectives; the motion was seconded on the record and carried. On the consolidation question, the committee debated precise wording to express a preference—rather than an absolute requirement—for an appointee with conservancy interests or a member recommended by the CLC (Conservancy Lands Commission) if Parks and CLC responsibilities are combined. The committee settled on language expressing a preference for a member with conservancy interests and carried the motion.
Members acknowledged limits on appointment control—mayoral appointments and council actions determine final membership—and discussed timing in relation to April council appointments and an upcoming referendum. The committee agreed to continue meeting as scheduled through the transitional period and to coordinate with council on effective dates if consolidation proceeds.
The motions were approved on the record; the committee noted that implementation details and staggered terms would be resolved later by council and the mayor’s appointments.