A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Middleton commission forwards three options on SASO occupancy clause after Capital Flight objects

April 04, 2024 | Middleton, Dane County, Wisconsin


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Middleton commission forwards three options on SASO occupancy clause after Capital Flight objects
The Middleton Airport Commission on April 4 discussed a contested amendment to the Specialized Aviation Service Operations (SASO) agreement involving a possible post‑term rental or occupancy charge that Capital Flight, LLC (named in the packet and represented in public input by Matt Hohfeld) said would undermine financing for its on‑field investments.

City staff summarized the history: the common council previously approved a SASO for Capital Flight with a term beginning April 16 and running to April 2039 (15 years). Capital Flight asked that language referencing a potential post‑5‑year rental/occupancy charge be struck because the company had invested in hangars and needed predictable lease terms to secure commercial financing.

The city attorney and commissioners reviewed models used by other airports and discussed alternatives that might address both city and tenant interests: (1) strike the occupancy language entirely; (2) keep the clause but synchronize any charge to the SASO term (15 years); or (3) offer a 10‑year SASO option (instead of 15) as an alternative to parties who object to post‑term cost adjustments. Legal counsel noted some airports tie charges to separate leases or gross‑revenue percentages, while others leave charges to lease negotiations.

Capital Flight’s representative said shorter terms or open‑ended fee exposure would make commercial lending and reinvestment difficult. Commissioners raised questions about economic impacts, FAA grant‑assurance constraints, and precedent for the airport. The commission agreed it lacked sufficient financial detail to set a fixed charge and voted to forward the three options with supporting context to the finance commission and common council for final policy and fiscal review.

The motion to forward the three options passed by voice vote; the finance commission will receive the recommendations, supporting notes and a summary of the airport commission’s discussion for deliberation and possible ordinance or lease language changes.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee