A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Subcommittee backs bill letting long‑term care residents predesignate visitors during emergencies

February 26, 2026 | 2026 Legislative Meetings, South Carolina


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Subcommittee backs bill letting long‑term care residents predesignate visitors during emergencies
A Medical and Health Affairs subcommittee voted to advance Senate Bill S146, a bill authorizing residents of long‑term care facilities to predesignate up to three people who must be allowed to visit during a declared emergency or public health crisis. The subcommittee also approved an amendment designating clergy as essential visitors who would not count toward the three‑person limit.

Randy Lee, president and CEO of the South Carolina Healthcare Association, representing approximately 175 nursing homes, told the committee his board voted 15–0 in support of the measure and argued that visitation—restricted during the COVID‑19 pandemic—affects residents’ health and quality of care. "One of the worst things we ever saw was not being able to allow our family members to come and visit during Covid," Lee said.

Family testimony underscored that point. Karen Heitman described the experience of her mother, Mary Blankenship, who was isolated during pandemic restrictions and later died after what Heitman described as severe malnutrition and bed sores; she urged the committee to pass the bill so families can monitor care.

Representative Beach offered an amendment to exempt clergy from counting toward the three designated visitors, explaining the change would ensure spiritual support at critical times. The amendment and the bill as amended passed on roll calls recorded as 'Aye' by Mister Beach, Miss Davis, Mister Montgomery, Mister Moore and Mister Sessions.

The bill now advances from subcommittee and will proceed through the chamber’s committee/floor process. Supporters argued the change would restore family oversight during emergencies; no formal opposition was recorded in the subcommittee testimony.

Next steps: S146 will move to subsequent legislative consideration per regular floor scheduling.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee