A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee advances Casey Casey as Oregon state forester after debate over timber revenue and agency funding

February 16, 2026 | Legislative, Oregon


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee advances Casey Casey as Oregon state forester after debate over timber revenue and agency funding
The Oregon Senate Rules Committee voted Monday to advance Casey Caseys nomination as state forester to the Senate floor after public testimony and a brief floor of committee debate about the agencys finances.

John DeLorenzo, representing Jewell School District, told the committee that reduced timber receipts will cut roughly 20% of his districts budget and urged senators not to confirm a permanent state forester until the governor presents a plan to address the shortfall. "Our district just received word that due to the lack of adequate timber receipts, we are going to lose about 20% of our budget," DeLorenzo said, and he asked the committee to exercise oversight before confirming a nominee.

Vice Chair Starr said she would oppose the confirmation to elevate the agencys fiscal challenges to the legislature and press the executive branch for a formal plan. "This is not about necessarily the individual," Starr said; her objection was aimed at pressing the governor and the Department of Forestry to address projected revenue declines and long-term sustainment of the agency.

Senator Golden and other supporters argued the department needs stable, confirmed leadership, particularly with what some senators described as a likely severe wildfire season ahead. Golden said the interim director had performed well and that permanent leadership could help address outstanding problems.

After debate, the committee called the roll; the motion to advance Casey Casey passed and the nomination was moved to the Senate floor for final confirmation.

The committee recorded the motion and vote in its work session; senators who spoke on the record included Vice Chair Starr (opposed), Senator Golden (in favor), Senator Thacker (no), Senator Manning (aye), and Chair Jones (aye).

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee