Lou D’Amico, owner of Jewett City Greenhouses, told the Energy and Technology Committee that his fourth‑generation family greenhouse faces steep, unpredictable natural‑gas demand charges because the utilities’ method locks a 12‑month demand ratchet to the single worst 24‑hour day in the year.
Under current Eversource practice D’Amico described, a single high‑use day during the peak heating season can set a demand component that remains on a customer’s bill for 12 months. He said a recent rate change increased his demand charge from roughly $2.93 to $3.79 per 100 CCF and that a high‑day ratchet can add several hundred dollars a month to a small grower’s bills for a full year. D’Amico said agriculture is seasonal and the current methodology penalizes farms that concentrate use in a short season.
Representative Lanou sponsored a proposal (SB 246 / HB 5246) to compute demand ratchets on a rolling quarterly basis for agricultural and farm‑permit customers so recorded peaks reflect recent seasonal usage rather than a single outlier day. Eversource representatives said during committee discussion that they do not have the authority to unilaterally change tariffs outside a rate proceeding and that policy questions of which customer classes should be treated differently properly belong in a rate case or Commission rulemaking.
Members of the committee asked Eversource whether it had previously discussed bespoke relief with affected growers and whether an expedited regulatory pathway exists; Eversource said it would consider testimony in the next rate case and that a legislative change could be discussed. The committee did not adopt legislation at the hearing; the company urged growers to participate in regulatory or rate‑case processes to make their case formally.