A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee hears bill to curb exploitative promoter fees for entry-level performers

February 25, 2026 | 2026 Legislature Georgia, Georgia


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee hears bill to curb exploitative promoter fees for entry-level performers
At a first hearing, Representative (author of HB 1400) introduced House Bill 1400 (LC620388), which the author described as a consumer-protection measure aimed at preventing promoters from charging performers fees without delivering the promised audience. The bill, the author said, would structure fair practices for promoters and define when talent agencies, nonprofits and municipalities are treated differently.

Describing the problem, the author gave an example of an entry-level artist charged $500 to perform for a 30-person venue and said promoters then sell additional spots, turning a small event into a lucrative take for the promoter. "This promoter says, I'm gonna put you on the show. And the venue was about 30 seats... He also goes back and charges 9 additional people. Well, he just made about $5,000," the author said, illustrating the complaint the bill seeks to address.

Committee members probed whether the bill requires promoters to be licensed and whether licensing should be handled at the municipal or state level. Representative Epstein and others noted some municipalities (the author cited Savannah) require promoter registration or business licensing; committee members observed that municipal rules vary and that a state-level licensing requirement is not explicit in the bill text. The chair noted the bill as introduced appears to focus on licensed talent agents; members recommended clarifying definitions and adding objective criteria for licensure or business registration, for example residency, revenue projections or municipal business licensing requirements.

One member said the draft reads in places like a contractual framework and suggested adding clearer criteria for what constitutes a licensed promoter; the author indicated receptiveness to adding an amendment requiring promoters to be licensed in Georgia and to refining the statutory language to better protect artists.

Next steps: Committee indicated follow-up work is needed; the author said staff would draft amendments and the committee will reconvene for another hearing early next week before crossover.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee