A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee debates Article V application to cap Supreme Court size; substitute fails, 40-first-day carried

February 25, 2026 | 2026 Legislature SD, South Dakota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee debates Article V application to cap Supreme Court size; substitute fails, 40-first-day carried
The committee considered SJR502, an application under Article V of the U.S. Constitution asking Congress to call a convention to propose an amendment capping the Supreme Court at nine justices.

Senator Mike Ruhl, sponsor, traced historical changes in Court size and urged the committee to support a congressional amendment or a state application that would back the effort. "Capping the court at 9 justices will protect the integrity of the Supreme Court," he told the committee. Proponents emphasized the historical precedent for states pressing Congress when federal action stalls.

Opponents, including constitutional scholars and public-interest witnesses, warned an Article V convention could open the Constitution to unrelated amendments and posed risks beyond the stated objective. After substitute motions and a roll-call, the committee did not adopt a do-pass substitute but subsequently approved a 40-first-day motion to place SJR502 on the calendar for future floor consideration.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee