Documents reviewed by Rep. Jim Jordan show Verizon subpoena sought his phone records back to Jan. 2020, report says
November 24, 2025 | House Committee on the Judiciary, House Committee, House, Legislative, Federal
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
A news broadcast reported that documents obtained by Representative Jim Jordan show that lawyers running the Arctic Frost investigation issued a 2022 subpoena to Verizon seeking Jordan's complete phone records dating back to January 2020 and other personal data.
According to the reporting, the subpoena asked Verizon for Jordan's address, payment information and unique device identifiers in addition to call and message records. The program quoted a court order accompanying the subpoena that said, "disclosure will result in flight from prosecution or witness intimidation," and said the order imposed secrecy on the data request.
A Verizon spokesperson provided a statement read during the broadcast: "We uncovered new information regarding chairman Jordan. We shared it with him as soon as possible. We are committed to restoring trust through transparency." The spokesperson also said Verizon is working with the House and Senate on the matter.
The report framed the subpoena as broader in scope than the investigation's ostensible focus on Jan. 6, 2021. It said the documents were part of material reviewed by Jordan's team and presented on the broadcast, and did not claim independent verification beyond that review.
The broadcast noted Jordan's position as a sitting member of the U.S. House of Representatives and chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary, saying his status made the secrecy order notable because, the program argued, he was "not exactly some criminal mastermind" likely to flee prosecution.
What happens next was not specified in the broadcast. The report did not present court filings beyond the quoted language, did not provide the full subpoena text, and did not report any response from Representative Jordan himself. The program's review of documents and Verizon's statement were the primary sources cited on air.
The reporting raises questions about the scope of subpoenas in the Arctic Frost investigation, the use of secrecy orders in such requests and about what information Verizon shared with congressional offices; the broadcast did not provide additional documentary evidence or responses beyond the Verizon statement.
According to the reporting, the subpoena asked Verizon for Jordan's address, payment information and unique device identifiers in addition to call and message records. The program quoted a court order accompanying the subpoena that said, "disclosure will result in flight from prosecution or witness intimidation," and said the order imposed secrecy on the data request.
A Verizon spokesperson provided a statement read during the broadcast: "We uncovered new information regarding chairman Jordan. We shared it with him as soon as possible. We are committed to restoring trust through transparency." The spokesperson also said Verizon is working with the House and Senate on the matter.
The report framed the subpoena as broader in scope than the investigation's ostensible focus on Jan. 6, 2021. It said the documents were part of material reviewed by Jordan's team and presented on the broadcast, and did not claim independent verification beyond that review.
The broadcast noted Jordan's position as a sitting member of the U.S. House of Representatives and chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary, saying his status made the secrecy order notable because, the program argued, he was "not exactly some criminal mastermind" likely to flee prosecution.
What happens next was not specified in the broadcast. The report did not present court filings beyond the quoted language, did not provide the full subpoena text, and did not report any response from Representative Jordan himself. The program's review of documents and Verizon's statement were the primary sources cited on air.
The reporting raises questions about the scope of subpoenas in the Arctic Frost investigation, the use of secrecy orders in such requests and about what information Verizon shared with congressional offices; the broadcast did not provide additional documentary evidence or responses beyond the Verizon statement.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
