A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Bill would criminalize driving around emergency barricades; sponsors cite rescues, opponents call it overreach

February 23, 2026 | Legislative Sessions, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Bill would criminalize driving around emergency barricades; sponsors cite rescues, opponents call it overreach
The Law and Justice Committee received briefing and public testimony on substitute House Bill 2203, which would create the offense of reckless interference with emergency operations for knowingly operating a vehicle on a public roadway that is closed due to hazardous conditions.

Tim Ford, staff counsel, outlined penalties: the offense is a misdemeanor (30-day license suspension) elevated to a gross misdemeanor (60-day suspension) if the violation requires emergency response and causes bodily injury to a first responder or if a minor or vulnerable adult is present; the Department of Licensing would suspend driving privileges accordingly and the bill allows recovery of emergency-response costs up to $25,000 per incident.

Representative Josh Penner, sponsor and a recently serving mayor, said the bill grew from firsthand experience during flooding, when people drove around barricades, became stranded and required multiple swift-water rescues. "We were doing an inordinate number of swift water responses for folks that were driving around emergency barricades," he said, arguing the law would create a "second thought" before people ignore closures.

Jeff Faucette, representing Washington Fire Chiefs, supported the bill, saying closures are safety measures and driving around them compromises incident control, increases responder exposure and creates secondary emergencies. He urged passage to reinforce that closures are not suggestions.

David Treeweiler (Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and Washington Defender Association) opposed the bill, calling it unnecessary, disproportionate and expensive to enforce. He described scenarios where ordinary motorists could face criminal records, fines, license suspensions and heavy restitution and urged the committee to consider making the offense an infraction rather than a criminal charge.

The committee closed the public hearing after hearing both supportive and opposing testimony and recorded a large number of sign-ins in support.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee