A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Senate committee hears confirmation for Corey McNally to the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board

February 23, 2026 | Legislative Sessions, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senate committee hears confirmation for Corey McNally to the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board
The Senate Human Services Committee held a gubernatorial appointment hearing on Feb. 23 for Corey McNally to continue serving on the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (ISRB).

Corey McNally (appointed originally by Gov. Inslee in August 2024 and reappointed by Gov. Ferguson for a five‑year term) described the ISRB's statutory functions: making release decisions for individuals under its jurisdiction, setting conditions of supervision, managing oversight of violations and approving release plans. McNally outlined a professional background in community mental health, the Special Commitment Center on McNeil Island and the Department of Corrections treatment and assessment programs.

Senators asked about the ISRB's relationship to civil commitment under RCW 7.109 and to sexually violent predator (SVP) proceedings. McNally said the ISRB operates under a different standard and statutory framework: release decisions under the ISRB use a "more likely than not" standard for the likelihood of committing the indexed offense if released, whereas civil commitment under RCW 7.109 uses a stricter criterion and is a separate court process. "So for civil commitment, it is a court process ... Individuals get sentenced under the ISRB just by their crime conviction," he said.

On performance and recidivism, McNally said the ISRB uses a structured decision‑making framework and that recent biannual reports found no racial discrepancy in release decisions; the board is pursuing a recidivism study to measure outcomes. He described victim participation procedures and said victim liaisons contact identified victims to offer written or in‑person testimony options.

Committee members thanked McNally for his expertise and commended the board’s reliance on actuarial risk assessments and evidence in decision‑making. The committee closed the confirmation hearing and subsequently returned to public testimony on the bills on the agenda; no confirmation vote was taken during the meeting.

Next steps: McNally's appointment will proceed through the normal confirmation process; the committee closed the appointment hearing with positive remarks about expertise and collegiality.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee