A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee advances HB 481 with amendment adjusting road‑usage date, clarifies UDOT leasing and fund flow

February 24, 2026 | 2026 Utah Legislature, Utah Legislature, Utah Legislative Branch, Utah


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee advances HB 481 with amendment adjusting road‑usage date, clarifies UDOT leasing and fund flow
Representative Kristofferson presented HB 481 (second substitute) as a transportation omnibus bill containing several UDOT-requested clarifications and program changes. He described provisions that explicitly confirm UDOT jurisdiction over rails and stations, allow UDOT to lease space at mobility hubs (for concessions such as coffee or ski shops), and terminate the federal-era clean‑vehicle decal system cited in the bill packet.

On road usage charges, Kristofferson explained the bill would set a basic annual registration fee of $280 while preserving mileage‑based options (including an app‑based odometer photo or use of on‑board telematics). The purpose, he said, is to encourage participation in mileage‑based RUC options and to align registration with what comparable vehicles would have contributed via gas tax.

Director Carlos Braceras of UDOT told the committee that lease revenue from mobility hubs would flow into the state transportation fund and then be allocated through the legislature’s annual appropriation process. Kristofferson also said corridor preservation funds would go directly to local governments instead of being routed through UDOT.

Senator Kwan successfully moved a floor amendment to change a statutory effective date in the bill from 2027 to 2028 (motion carried 5–1 with Senator Harper recorded as the lone nay). After further brief discussion, the committee voted to pass HB 481 as amended with a favorable recommendation to the full Senate.

The committee did not receive extended public opposition on the bill in committee; questions centered on RUC implementation timing, the preservation of user choice between registration and mileage reporting, and how revenue would be appropriated.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee