A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee approves amended safer‑skies drone bill, grants DPS rulemaking authority and raises penalty

February 19, 2026 | 2026 Legislature SD, South Dakota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee approves amended safer‑skies drone bill, grants DPS rulemaking authority and raises penalty
PIERRE, S.D. — Law enforcement groups and the Department of Public Safety won committee approval for an amended bill that would give state authorities limited rulemaking power and increase penalties for unlawful drone operations over certain protected facilities.

Scott Rectenbaugh of the Department of Public Safety asked lawmakers to support HB 12‑80 as amended, saying DPS, the Department of Military, DOT and the governor’s office worked with the sponsor to pare the bill to conform with pending federal guidance. Rectenbaugh said federal action, including the Safer Skies Act and recent congressional legislation, allows states to play a greater role once required training and operational standards are finalized.

The amendment grants rulemaking authority to DPS under SDCL 50‑15‑3 so the department can adopt rules identifying mitigation techniques and countermeasures that trained law enforcement officers may use to address unlawful drone activity in narrowly defined protected areas. The amendment also increases the penalty for violations from a class 1 misdemeanor to a class 6 felony, a change proponents said was needed to deter malicious or reckless conduct.

Savannah Cruz of the Police Chiefs Association and Stacy Ackerman of the South Dakota Sheriffs Association testified in favor, calling the measure a measured step for local and national security. An online proponent from the Ellsworth Development Authority also voiced support.

Committee members asked clarifying questions about judicial discretion for criminal penalties; sponsors and colleagues noted judges retain sentencing discretion even when statutory maximums increase. Representative Schubach moved a do‑pass recommendation; the committee voted 11 yeas with 2 excused and agreed to place the bill on the consent calendar for next week.

Speakers quoted include Scott Rectenbaugh (Department of Public Safety), Savannah Cruz (Police Chiefs Association), and Stacy Ackerman (South Dakota Sheriffs Association).

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee