A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Vermont Center for Crime Victim Services asks committee for $102,729 in general-fund support

February 20, 2026 | Judiciary, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Committees, Legislative , Vermont


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Vermont Center for Crime Victim Services asks committee for $102,729 in general-fund support
Jennifer Pullman, representing the Vermont Center for Crime Victim Services, told the House Judiciary Committee the center is asking for $102,729 in general-fund support to cover administrative costs and grant management.

"Weare a state agency that's doing mandated work for free, and we cannot continue to do that," Pullman said, explaining the center's general-fund request is distinct from a network request the committee has also considered. Pullman said the center does not take administrative fees from general-fund dollars that go directly to community providers.

Members pressed for clarity on how last year's $450,000 appropriation was allocated. Pullman said the center recommended holding the full $450,000 in the special fund to rebuild reserves because special funds are declining; instead, a portion was dispersed to the network and this increased the fund's ongoing obligations. She described the centeras recommending a more conservative approach to avoid increased long-term obligations on a shrinking revenue base.

Committee members and Pullman acknowledged overlapping asks in which the network's request appears to include an administrative component intended for the center; Pullman said the center's preference is a separate general-fund line for its administrative role while the network request addresses program funding and member disbursements.

Pullman also explained the center's broader fiduciary role over special and federal funds, the constraints created by declines in those revenue streams, and why the center recommended reserving funds rather than increasing obligations in the special fund.

The committee asked staff to clarify materials and correct the documents showing the separations of the requests; no appropriation was adopted in this session. The panel scheduled follow-up work to reconcile the center and network budget requests.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee