Parents, students and staff urge Judson ISD trustees to spare Rolling Meadows, Millers Point and Fran’s

Dozens of parents, teachers and students packed the Judson Independent School District special meeting to urge trustees not to close several elementary campuses proposed for consolidation. Speakers focused their remarks on Rolling Meadows Elementary, Millers Point Elementary and Fran’s Leadership Academy, saying closures would disrupt special‑education services, extracurricular programs and long‑standing community ties.

"Closing Rolling Meadows is not the responsible solution," said Christy (who asked the board to call her "W"), speaking on behalf of Rolling Meadows families. She told the board the campus had been removed from an earlier closure list after a committee review, then — she said — was placed back on the list after "a board member's 4 a.m. Facebook post," a sequence she called nontransparent and damaging to trust. Other parents and staff echoed that account and urged the board to examine projected neighborhood growth and not rely solely on utilization figures.

Multiple students spoke directly to trustees. "This school is not just a building. It is memories," said 4th‑grader Sarah Canales, describing her experience at Rolling Meadows and asking trustees to "look beyond numbers on a page." Educators described campus programs that would be difficult to recreate quickly elsewhere: Watch D.O.G.S., Adventure Club, Play Enrichment Camp and a veteran high‑school internship pipeline were cited as examples of services that help families and future educators.

Staff and special‑education advocates warned of the practical impacts on vulnerable students. "Three schools in three years — and not because of anything that child did — but because of decisions adults made," said a Rolling Meadows educator describing families who have been moved repeatedly. Administrators and several parents emphasized that early‑intervention ECSE and other specialized units require continuity and suitable space.

Speakers also raised financial and logistical questions. A number of presenters argued that closing newer or well‑maintained campuses would not produce the savings advertised once transportation and repurposing costs are counted. One parent cited a district estimate that closing a single elementary might produce roughly $1.3 million to $1.6 million in recurring savings, but several witnesses said lost enrollment to charters or vouchers and new transportation costs could offset those gains.

Trustees thanked speakers and said they would weigh the testimony alongside staff data. The public‑comment period concluded after roughly two hours of testimony; the board then paused for a recess before administration presented consolidated analysis and recommendations.