A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee hears testimony supporting transparency for workers’ compensation rate-setting

February 20, 2026 | Legislative Sessions, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee hears testimony supporting transparency for workers’ compensation rate-setting
The Labor and Workplace Standards Committee heard bipartisan support Feb. 20 for Senate Bill 61 36, which would require the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) to publish the actuarially indicated premium rate for each workers’ compensation risk class and to disclose when the department caps increases below those levels.

Kelly Leonard, staff to the committee, told members the bill would require L&I to publish the actuarial indicated rate, identify classifications where the department limits increases, state what the rate would have been without that limitation, and show how limiting increases affects premium rates in other classes. "Rates are set using actuarial principles and must be designed to limit fluctuations and encourage accident prevention," Leonard said during the staff briefing.

Industry groups—represented by Andrea Ray of the Washington Hospitality Association, Mike Ennis of the Building Industry Association of Washington, Jerry Vanderwood of the Associated General Contractors, and Chris Tefft of the Washington Self Insurers Association—urged passage as a transparency measure. Ray said greater visibility “helps employers plan responsibly, invest in workplace safety, and strengthen their partnership with the department.”

Supporters said the disclosure would help employers, particularly small businesses, understand reserve use and whether their premiums reflect their own risk or are subsidizing other classes. Tefft noted interest in details about rate-capped classes and the impacts of recent expansions in presumptive PTSD claims on specific rate classes.

No formal amendments or final action on SB 61 36 occurred during the public hearing; the committee closed the public testimony and later handled several bills in executive session. The bill was presented to the committee with testimony from both staff and multiple industry panels.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee