Fair organizers tell appropriations panel capital grants and stipends spur local economic activity, urge help with 3‑acre rule
February 18, 2026 | Appropriations, SENATE, Committees, Legislative , Vermont
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
Several fair organizers and volunteers addressed the Senate Appropriations Committee during public comment on Feb. 18 to describe how capital grants and stipend funds help sustain fairs and local economies.
Jackie Colson, lobbyist and secretary for the fairs association, said the program is not always about asking for more money but recognizes the return fairs provide: "When you consider that we're getting $410,000 as an investment from the legislature, these fairs put $9,000,000 back into the economy of the state of Vermont over the entire year," she said, describing the capital grant and stipend program uses for premiums and operational support.
Scott Sheehy, representing a regional fair, detailed capital projects used to update electrics and repower infrastructure and said capital grant dollars allowed them to complete a multi‑year plan with improvements that increased public support. Lana Contwarski and other fair officials described repairing barns, sewer and water lines, and noted premiums and stipends support prize money and participant incentives (one fair reported nearly $22,000 in premium payouts in the past year).
Speakers raised a pressing compliance challenge known as the '3‑acre rule' that affects fairgrounds with impervious-surface limits and can force costly engineering work or relocation. Commenters said a past legislative allocation of $2,000,000 was set aside to help fairs under that constraint, with distributions of roughly $550,000 to several fairs (Champlain Valley, Orleans and others) and a smaller feasibility allocation reported for Rutland ($175,000) to study options.
Speakers emphasized that many fairs are volunteer-run nonprofits reliant on seed capital from the state to carry out capital improvements and pay premiums that draw participants and visitors. Several said projects are 'shovel-ready' but constrained by engineering timelines and permit backlogs; some cautioned that multi-year construction could threaten a fair's continuity.
Committee members asked clarifying questions; no formal committee action was taken during the public comment period.
Jackie Colson, lobbyist and secretary for the fairs association, said the program is not always about asking for more money but recognizes the return fairs provide: "When you consider that we're getting $410,000 as an investment from the legislature, these fairs put $9,000,000 back into the economy of the state of Vermont over the entire year," she said, describing the capital grant and stipend program uses for premiums and operational support.
Scott Sheehy, representing a regional fair, detailed capital projects used to update electrics and repower infrastructure and said capital grant dollars allowed them to complete a multi‑year plan with improvements that increased public support. Lana Contwarski and other fair officials described repairing barns, sewer and water lines, and noted premiums and stipends support prize money and participant incentives (one fair reported nearly $22,000 in premium payouts in the past year).
Speakers raised a pressing compliance challenge known as the '3‑acre rule' that affects fairgrounds with impervious-surface limits and can force costly engineering work or relocation. Commenters said a past legislative allocation of $2,000,000 was set aside to help fairs under that constraint, with distributions of roughly $550,000 to several fairs (Champlain Valley, Orleans and others) and a smaller feasibility allocation reported for Rutland ($175,000) to study options.
Speakers emphasized that many fairs are volunteer-run nonprofits reliant on seed capital from the state to carry out capital improvements and pay premiums that draw participants and visitors. Several said projects are 'shovel-ready' but constrained by engineering timelines and permit backlogs; some cautioned that multi-year construction could threaten a fair's continuity.
Committee members asked clarifying questions; no formal committee action was taken during the public comment period.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
