Police chiefs, standards council and dozens of public commenters weigh in against masked officers; committee schedules more hearings on HB250

The House State Affairs Committee took invited and public testimony on House Bill 250 on Feb. 17, a proposal to prohibit city, state and federal peace officers from wearing facial coverings that conceal identity while performing official duties.

Chief Sean Case of the Anchorage Police Department and president of the Alaska Association of Chiefs of Police testified against masking by officers and opposed HB250, saying visible name tags and badges promote trust and accountability. "I oppose police officers wearing masks to conceal their identity, and I oppose House Bill 250," Case said, adding that officers have historically served with visible identification despite risks to individual officers and that masking to conceal identity is not a local practice.

Sarah Heeb, administrative investigator for the Alaska Police Standards Council, provided technical context and told the committee the council’s regulations do not specifically address officer masking; she offered to return with implementation details.

Public testimony—taken from callers across Fairbanks, Juneau and Anchorage and in‑room speakers—was broadly supportive of HB250. Testifiers urged clear rules requiring name and badge display, suggested creating criminal penalties when masks are combined with other criminal conduct, and cited federal incidents (including masked federal agents) as a rationale for preventive state action. Comments included concerns that masks hinder de‑escalation and nonverbal communication.

Chair Kerrick closed public testimony and said the committee will invite Chief Case and the Police Standards Council back at future hearings to address implementation questions. No committee vote occurred on HB250 during the Feb. 17 hearing.