A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee adopts AI 'bill of rights' substitute targeting companion chatbots, parental controls and bot disclosure

February 18, 2026 | 2026 Legislature FL, Florida


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee adopts AI 'bill of rights' substitute targeting companion chatbots, parental controls and bot disclosure
Senators adopted a substitute for SB 482, an artificial intelligence bill of rights that sets baseline consumer protections for children and vulnerable adults and establishes constraints on certain AI uses by state contractors and education providers.

Sponsor Senator Leake said the measure focuses on companion chatbots and other generative AI that can appear to form relationships with users, and described requirements that platforms hosting companion bots must prevent minors from opening or retaining accounts without parental consent, periodically remind minors to take breaks, and disclose that the interlocutor is artificially generated. The substitute also requires parental notice before school use of certain AI tools and gives the Department of Legal Affairs enforcement authority for consumer protections with enhanced penalties for violations involving minors.

Industry witnesses said they appreciate the sponsor’s outreach and some changes in the strike‑all but raised practical concerns about age verification and collection of sensitive identity information. Adam Bassler of Associated Industries noted that requiring parental verification could force companies to collect and retain large amounts of personally identifiable data and create new privacy and cybersecurity risks: "Complying with these provisions means collecting a ton of ID... creating large databases of high value personal data," he said. Other witnesses including child‑safety advocates supported the measure as a state‑level safeguard while noting implementation challenges.

The committee adopted the substitute amendment and reported the bill favorably; sponsors and stakeholders signaled willingness to continue technical work as the bill proceeds.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee