Committee narrowly recommends immigration‑enforcement preemption bill after heated debate and public opposition

The Senate Military Affairs and Border Security Committee voted 4‑3 to advance Senate Bill 14‑74 as amended, a measure that would preempt local limits on cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, require immigration enforcement training across state and some local agencies, and direct county sheriffs to enter into 287(g) agreements by Jan. 1, 2027, under the amendment presented.

Sponsor Senator Rogers described the bill as ensuring uniform cooperation with federal immigration law and allowing the attorney general to investigate alleged preemption violations. She said training and cooperation reduce the need for federal law enforcement in local communities.

Multiple public witnesses—including the Reverend Erica Von Haaren, Anna Lozicky and Brandy Wilkins—testified strongly against the bill. Von Haaren argued the measure "adds to hurt and fear in our communities" and said immigration enforcement should remain a federal responsibility. Wilkins told the panel "police departments exist to keep communities safe, not to serve as extensions of ICE," warning that forced cooperation would damage trust and public safety.

Committee debate included questions about whether the bill represents an unfunded mandate, whether it would make local agencies de facto arms of ICE and how the attorney general's enforcement mechanism would operate. Supporters argued the measure increases cooperation and reduces chaotic federal deployments, while opponents warned of civil‑rights risks and fiscal costs.

After extended public testimony and committee remarks, the panel voted to give SB 14‑74 a due‑pass recommendation as amended; the bill will proceed to the Senate floor for further consideration.