A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

UC reports strong FY2025 performance ratings, extra earned fee for national labs

January 17, 2026 | University of California, Boards and Commissions, Executive, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

UC reports strong FY2025 performance ratings, extra earned fee for national labs
University officials reported to the National Laboratories Committee on Jan. 7 that the three UC‑affiliated national laboratories received strong federal performance ratings for fiscal 2025 and that the system earned additional fee income tied to that performance.

June Yoo, vice president for National Labs, said Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory received high marks from DOE Office of Science and an overall mission accomplishment rating; the Advanced Light Source upgrade remains a high priority for delivery. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory earned an "excellent" rating with a record fusion yield at the National Ignition Facility and successful transition of the El Capitan supercomputer to production. Los Alamos received a "very good" overall rating with strengths in global nuclear‑security missions but ongoing capital project management challenges.

Yoo reported the system had conservatively budgeted for $30 million in earned fee at Livermore and Los Alamos but actually earned about $38.4 million, a favorable variance that will be included in an annual spend plan returned for committee and board approval. Committee members questioned the linkage between numerical ratings and fee calculations; Yoo explained the performance management evaluation plans and formulas that determine fee percentages.

Committee discussion highlighted materials control and accountability processes at Livermore, capital project oversight at Los Alamos and the need to direct earned funds through the established regional spend‑plan process. No formal votes on allocations were recorded in open session; the committee will review a proposed spend plan before authorizing disbursement.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee