A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Historic district tables roof replacement for 865 2nd Street over structural and historic concerns

May 06, 2024 | Natchitoches Historic District Commission, Natchitoches, Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Historic district tables roof replacement for 865 2nd Street over structural and historic concerns
The Natchitoches Historic District Commission on a voice vote tabled a roof-replacement application from Rick Lanning for his property at 865 2nd Street after commissioners said they needed more technical information about the house’s substructure and the historical appropriateness of a metal roof.

Lanning told commissioners the existing roof consists of multiple layers — aluminum shingles, asphalt layers and original cedar shake — and that the underlying lath has 6–8 inch spacing that he said prevents installing conventional architectural shingles. He described tarps and ongoing water intrusion and said replacing the roof with a tin roof would reproduce the current appearance while reducing maintenance.

Commissioners raised two central concerns. Commissioner Salter said metal roofs were not typical for residential structures in the historic district and urged restoration toward materials consistent with the building’s period. Other commissioners said the board lacked engineering information showing the roof framing could or could not support new sheathing and conventional shingles. One commissioner recommended obtaining competitive estimates that compare the cost of reconstructing the substructure and installing architectural shingles versus a metal roof.

The commission agreed to meet on-site as soon as Lanning could secure contractors or an engineer who could examine the roof and provide cost options. Commissioner Salter moved to table the application; Commissioner Donahoe seconded. The motion to table carried on a voice vote. The commission said it would reconvene with the applicant once the requested structural and cost information is available.

The application was tabled; no construction authorization was issued. The commission suggested the applicant coordinate with the staff liaison for an on-site review within two weeks if possible.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee