Subcommittee splits on auto-dealer language; opts to continue debate

The Bylaw Subcommittee reviewed Measure 2026-047 on Feb. 4, a proposed change to the zoning use schedule that would make new and used auto-dealer uses subject to special permit review by the Planning Board instead of outright prohibition.

Town Manager Borg proposed amending the earlier draft to replace prohibitions with a special-permit requirement, allowing planning professionals to evaluate site-specific proposals rather than a blanket ban. "It would not be prohibited, but require special permit, granted by the planning board," Borg said, outlining the planning-board review as a way to evaluate compatibility with the community.

Councilors voiced divided views. Councilor Wagner warned that special permits can open the door to undesirable "cement sprawl" and argued the town should be assertive about the kinds of development it wants to attract; Councilor Simmons argued against government picking business winners and favored market-driven outcomes. Other councilors described the proposed change as a pragmatic compromise that preserves the Planning Board's discretion while enabling review of individual proposals.

Planning Board members explained their prior mixed vote history and the need to reconcile the Planning Board's recommendation with the subcommittee's direction. Town staff explained that if the subcommittee accepts an amendment changing prohibition to special permit, staff would likely need to withdraw and resubmit the measure or send the amended language back to the Planning Board for a new vote before the council public hearing.

Given the substantive change and open questions about process, the subcommittee voted to continue the measure to Feb. 18 so staff can consult the town attorney, clarify whether a new Planning Board vote is required, and prepare revised language for the council's public hearing schedule.