A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee backs HJR 15 to give courts new sanction option and faster protection for government attorneys

February 12, 2026 | 2026 Utah Legislature, Utah Legislature, Utah Legislative Branch, Utah


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee backs HJR 15 to give courts new sanction option and faster protection for government attorneys
The House Rules Standing Committee on Feb. 12 unanimously adopted the first substitute and favorably recommended House Joint Resolution 15, a rule change package that amends Rule 11 (sanctions for misrepresentations to the court) and Rule 41 (dismissal procedures).

Sponsor Representative Anthony E. Loubet told the committee Rule 11 currently allows courts to impose sanctions but that judges have sometimes been reluctant to use available remedies. HJR 15 adds an option for courts, when appropriate, to require that sanctioned parties make charitable contributions to nonprofit organizations that provide free or low-cost legal assistance, provided the court approves and the nonprofit is independent of the judiciary.

On dismissals, the resolution instructs that when a party sues an attorney because they represented a governmental entity, the attorney may file a motion to dismiss the suit quickly; if the court finds bad faith by a preponderance of the evidence, the court may award attorney fees to the injured party to deter such suits.

Public commenter Seth Stewart urged the committee to consider access-to-justice implications, saying he worried mandatory-fee awards or mandatory charity could chill plaintiffs’ willingness to bring meritorious claims. "I’m concerned about a chilling effect this could have on access to justice," Stewart said.

Representative Peterson moved the first substitute; the committee then moved and voted to favorably recommend HJR 15 (first substitute). The chair ruled passage unanimous on a voice vote. The sponsor and members said the changes are intended to provide courts with more meaningful options while protecting pro bono and legal-aid providers.

What’s next: HJR 15 (first substitute) advances with a committee recommendation. Drafting and implementation details, including definitions of eligible nonprofits and safeguards against unintended chilling effects, may be clarified in later stages.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee