A former senior adviser to the U.S. Department of Education told committee members that abolishing the Department would "absolutely result in delays in people's ability to access important critical federal aid and their ability to manage their student loans." The adviser said disruptions would affect both the Pell Grant program and ongoing federal student loan servicing.
The witness described staff and program changes already occurring across agencies, saying, "We're already seeing this, as different agencies ... have been moved around as staff, critical staff, who manage these contracts with loan services, for instance, or who work in the ombudsman's office who help borrowers have been, part of these reductions in force." The testimony attributed those movements and reductions to gaps that would widen if the Department ceased to exist.
The witness said those staffing and administrative gaps would leave borrowers without protections and services: "So it means that critical protections and programs are not available for students." They warned that the impacts would be uneven, singling out low-income students and students of color: "For many low income students and students of color, that means they will either drop out of school and never go back or never make it to school to begin with." The adviser closed by noting that existing borrowers could face heightened financial harm, saying students with loans "may end up in delinquency or default, which is can have catastrophic consequences."
The exchange in the hearing was a question-and-answer sequence: a committee question asked what would happen to Pell Grant administration and the federal student loan portfolio if the Department no longer existed, and the witness provided the explanation above. No formal proposals or votes on abolishing the Department were recorded in this transcript excerpt; the record reflects the witness's assessment rather than a committee finding or action.
Next steps were not specified in the transcript excerpt provided.